INR @ home



The problem with warfarin (at least, until the alternatives arrive) is monitoring its efficacy – usually done with regular measuring of the INR. Dosing warfarin varies greatly between patients, days, diets, and other medications, which definitely makes it more difficult. Previously, patients would have to come in to a pathology lab to have their blood taken, but now point of care devices have made testing INR easier, meaning that patients can take it more frequently – but these devices can be more accurate. 


Which brings us to a common question in medicine – easier and less accurate, or harder and more accurate?


The New England Journal of Medicine  looked at 2922 patients, either testing themselves at home weekly, or coming into clinic monthly, and compared major event rates (stroke, major bleeding events, or death). Results were…similar. To summarise:

  • time to first primary event was not significantly different (statistically)
  • self testing group
    • higher time in target INR range
    • higher patient satisfaction
    • more minor bleeding episodes
Good to know when educating patients about warfarin – especially if they aren’t keen to come to clinic every month and you’re happy with their compliance in self testing. Read more about it here





IMAGE: Jug Jones
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s